In re Sugarman
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
At our direction, the District IX Ethics Committee conducted an investigation of the propriety of defendant’s conduct in the purchase of real property at a Sheriff’s sale in Monmouth County and in related litigation. After conducting an investiga*9tion and a hearing, the Committee issued a presentment charging respondent with violations of DR 7-102(A)(1) (filing a suit that serves to harass or maliciously injure another) and DR 7-102(A)(5) (knowingly making a false statement of law or fact). Thereafter, the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) conducted a hearing de novo on the record, after which…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Assoulin v. SugarmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re LabendzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010