Legal Opinion

Brown v. Wilson

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided January 27, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00071Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION RODNEY SCOTT BROWN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 2:22-cv-00071-SRC ) AARON WILSON, ) ) ) Respondent. ) Memorandum and Order This matter comes before the Court on Rodney Scott Brown’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Doc. 1. Having reviewed Brown’s filings, the Court finds that the Younger doctrine precludes the Court from interfering with the state criminal prosecution of Brown. Additionally, Brown has failed to exhaust his available state-court remedies. The Court therefore dismisses…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API