Legal Opinion

State v. Sykes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2014No. Nos. 87946-0; 87947-8PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.

¶1 Many Washington counties have established drug courts designed to address and treat the underlying drug-related problems of certain adult criminal defendants. Most, but not all, adult drug courts hold closed meetings, usually called staffings, where the drug court judge, attorneys, and treatment professionals meet to discuss each drug court participant’s progress. Following staffings, the drug court judge holds review hearings in open court, recounts the issues discussed at the staffing, receives the participant’s input, and then makes a decision as to the appropriate next steps in each…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. SublettWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In re the Detention of MorganWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. In Re the Detention of D.F.F.Washington Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Dependency of E.H.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In re Dependency of E.H.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Julie M. Atwood v. Mission Support Alliance, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State Of Washington v. Gavin David WolfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington v. Michael Joseph LeclechCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API