Legal Opinion

Abraham v. McSoud

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 28, 1941No. 29730PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, commenced this action against the defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, by filing a petition containing three causes of action. Motion to require the plaintiffs to make an election of remedies was sustained. The plaintiffs thereupon filed an amended petition wherein they sought to recover upon a parol contract to hold and re-convey certain real property. Separate demurrers of defendants were sustained to the amended petition. Plaintiffs elected to stand thereon, and thereupon the action was dismissed, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Logan v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Oliphant v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Reed v. Peck & Hills Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Gypsy Oil Co. v. ColbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Oklahoma Wheat Pool Terminal Corp. v. RodgersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morris v. LeverettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Stallings v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Renegar v. BruningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Exchange Bank of Perry v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Rockett v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API