Legal Opinion

Descombaz v. Klock

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1932No. File No. 6726PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff and caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant in the operation of an automobile upon the public highway, and is before us on rehearing. The former opinion is reported in 58 S. D. 173, 235 N. W. 502, where an extended statement of the facts may be found. Respondent contends that the defendant cannot avail himself of the defense of contributory negligence, other than the specific defense of negligence on the part of the plaintiff pleaded in 'his answer. A rehearing was granted that we might give further…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Mellon v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Runge v. Prairie States Ins. of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Staib v. TarbellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Runge v. Prairie States Ins. of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API