Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 19, 1962No. 13839PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, Circuit Judge.

Is a television network affiliation contract for a two-year term, automatically renewable in the absence of termination notice for successive two-year terms, a depreciable asset?

That is the question presented by this petition for review of the Decision of the Tax Court which answered it in the negative 1 premised on its determination that the contract had “an indeterminate useful life” as of the close of the tax years here involved.

The facts critical to our disposition may be summarized as follows:

On June 1, 1953, Westinghouse Broadcasting Company, Inc. (“taxpayer”)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  2. Robert C. Hoffman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Richmond Television Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
  2. KFOX, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  3. Southern Natural Gas Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  4. Forward Communications Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Indiana Broadcasting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API