Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Montague
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
Attached to the petition, as a part thereof, is a statement of the physician attending the plaintiff, which constitutes an essential and required portion of the proof of disability furnished by the plaintiff to the defendant. The defendant claims that it does not appear from this statement that the plaintiff is “wholly and permanently disabled,” within the meaning of the provisions of the policies with respect thereto, in that the physician, in answering the question propounded in the statement to him as to how soon, in his opinion, would the insured be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. MiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- New York Life Insurance v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Equitable Life Assurance Society v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Lester v. Piedmont & Arlington Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robbert v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United StatesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. BurkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Joseph Alton Bowers v. Continental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Grayhouse v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- City of Lakeland v. Lawson Music Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.