Legal Opinion
United Pacific Insurance v. Cottonwood Properties, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 31, 1987No. 2 CA-CV 87-0130PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from the granting of a summary judgment. The determinative issue here is whether a mechanic’s lien which has expired because there was no action filed to foreclose it within six months can be revived by the relationback doctrine of Rule 15, Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S. The answer is no, and we affirm.
There are no factual disputes. On October 28, 1985, L. G. Lefler, Inc. (Lefler), a general contractor, and United Pacific Insurance Company (United Pacific), a surety, filed an action for declaratory relief against Westin La Paloma Hotel (La…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- AAA Fencing Co. v. Raintree Development & Energy Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
- Persky v. PuglisiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Rogers v. Smith Kline & French LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Gene McVety, Inc. v. Don Grady Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Regal Wood Prod v. Ist Wis. Nat. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. OlsonDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1991
- HCZ Construction Inc. v. First Franklin Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Diehl Lumber Transportation Inc. v. MickelsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Diehl Lumber Transportation Inc. v. MickelsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.