Daniel v. Mason
Texas Supreme Court
Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Second District, in an appeal from Tarrant County. Motion to permit plaintiffs in error to prosecute writ without bond. The guardian ad litem for minor defendants in the trial court prosecuted, without giving bond, a writ of error from a judgment in favor of plaintiff. The judgment being affirmed, the guardian obtained writ of error from the Supreme Court, who in granting the writ, required him to file writ of error bond.
1Opinion of the Court
GAINES, Chief Justice.
Under a general order of the court, the applicants far the writ of error having given no bond upon the suing out of the writ from the District Court to the Court of Civil Appeals, upon granting the writ a rule was entered that the plaintiffs in error should file a writ of error bond, as required by the statute. This is a motion to rescind that order, and to permit the plaintiffs in error to prosecute their writ without bond.
The writs of error to this court and to the Court of Civil Appeals were prosecuted by the guardian ad litem of certain minor defendants in the trial…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. GibbsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1939
- Jones v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Graham v. ClearmanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Jones v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1939