Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Jolon Carthorne, Sr.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 13, 2013No. 11-4870Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDavis, Circuit Judge

My good friend Judge Keenan has written a very fine opinion. I assume her effort does not run afoul of the prohibition on advisory opinions by federal courts. See Preiser v. Newkirk, 422 U.S. 395, 401, 95 S.Ct. 2330, 45 L.Ed.2d 272 (1975) (stating “a federal court has neither the power to render advisory opinions nor to decide questions that cannot affect the rights of litigants in the case before them”) (internal quotation marks omitted).1 Accordingly, I *518am pleased to join that part of her opinion which adds to the extant circuit split on the issue of whether, under the residual clauses of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. United States v. Jose Escalante-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. DocampoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API