Legal Opinion
United States v. $58,422.00 in U.S. Currency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 14, 2005No. 04-55094PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Christopher Boultinghouse appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the government on its in rem civil forfeiture action against $58,422 in cash, a vehicle, and two pieces of jewelry (the “defendant assets”). We affirm the district court.
We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Buono v. Norton, 371 F.3d 543, 545 (9th Cir.2004). The inferences drawn from the underlying facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587-88,106 S.Ct. 1348, 1356, 89…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Buono v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. $93,685.61 in U.S. Currency, Benjamin Lonzo Willis, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States of America, Ruby Hysell, Claimant-Appellant v. Currency, U.S. $42,500.00Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Real Property Known as 22249 Dolorosa StreetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Assorted Jewelry Approximately Valued of $44,328.00Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- United States v. $15,860 in U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Boultinghouse v. HallDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008