Belton v. Gebhart
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Chancellor:
The question for decision in both cases here presented is whether the State of Delaware, through its agencies, has violated the plaintiffs’ rights under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Two actions were filed. They were consolidated for trial purposes and are here being decided. Although the plaintiffs sued by guardians ad litem, I shall embrace only the minors when referring to “plaintiffs.”
In the first action the plaintiffs are eight minors who sue on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated. Plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Plessy v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Sweatt v. PainterSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Gong Lum v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- People, Ex Rel. King v. . GallagherNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Briggs v. ElliottDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating EngineersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Evans v. BuchananDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Belton v. GebhartCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
- Gebhart v. BeltonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Neoplan USA Corp. v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.