Norfolk National Bank v. City National Bank of Norfolk
Baltimore City Court
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
The attachment case in which the goods seized were sold under Art. 9, Sec. 26, Code, 1892, c. 642, having been finally disposed of by the quashing of the attachment, the fund in controversy, amounting to $261.09, the proceeds of such sale, now remains in the hands of the clerk, “subject to the order of the Court.”
The defendant, Vellines, claiming title to this fund, applied for an order directing the Court to pay it over to him or his attorney. This application is contested by the Norfolk National Bank, a judgment creditor of the defendant, whose execution has been returned “nulla bona.” It…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gumbel v. PitkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Freedman's Savings & Trust Co. v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Craig v. WrothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
- Coulbourn v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Muhr v. PinoverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.