Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Richmond

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1979No. OSB 1297, SC 25749PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The question to be decided is whether Henry R. Richmond HI, a member of the Oregon State Bar, committed a professional impropriety when he wrote a letter informing the Governor of Oregon of an administrative proceeding initiated by Richmond on behalf of private parties and sent copies of the letter to a number of legislators and newspaper editors. The Oregon State Bar charged Richmond with a violation of DR 7-107(G), a disciplinary rule directing attorneys involved in a pending administrative proceeding to abstain from making public statements about the facts or merits at issue in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LasswellOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Boulder Medical Center v. MooreColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Oregon State Police Officers Ass'n v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BurrowsOregon Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API