In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Richmond
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The question to be decided is whether Henry R. Richmond HI, a member of the Oregon State Bar, committed a professional impropriety when he wrote a letter informing the Governor of Oregon of an administrative proceeding initiated by Richmond on behalf of private parties and sent copies of the letter to a number of legislators and newspaper editors. The Oregon State Bar charged Richmond with a violation of DR 7-107(G), a disciplinary rule directing attorneys involved in a pending administrative proceeding to abstain from making public statements about the facts or merits at issue in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LasswellOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Boulder Medical Center v. MooreColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
- Oregon State Police Officers Ass'n v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BurrowsOregon Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.