K.M. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BASKIN, Judge.
K.M., a juvenile, appeals the trial court’s adjudication of delinquency for possession of cocaine with intent to sell. We affirm.
First, we decline to consider K.M. s contention that the trial court abused its discretion in permitting the narcotics officers to testify concerning the packaging of the cocaine. Because the specific legal ground argued on appeal was not presented to the trial court, K.M. has not properly preserved that point for review. Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985). Second, the adjudication of delinquency is supported by substantial competent, albeit…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tillman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- United States v. Frank Robinson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- G.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bruce v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- C.L.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Scarlett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Brooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-116553Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.