Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1930No. 10482PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherick, J.

Several errors are complained of, but all are conceded to be embodied in the one question, as to whether or not under 1465-76 GC, it was the intention of the Legislature, to permit an injured employee to secure full compensation for his injury from his employer and also from the Industrial Commission under the law as it existed prior to July of 1925.

Examination of that section as it then stood clearly indicates that the employee had the right to make his election as to whether he would seek compensation as against the employer or the commission. The very fact that he is given the option is…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Knisely v. Federal Crop Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1971
  2. In the Matter of Robert Kenneth Ralston, D/B/A Ralston T. v. Sales & Service, Bankrupt. Ford Motor Credit Company v. James C. Baggott, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  3. Ward v. National Bank of PauldingPaulding County Court of Common Pleas · 1965
  4. Franklin Park Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API