Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Richard Alan Haes, D/B/A H & H Distributing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 17, 1977No. 76-1784Published

1DissentWebster, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. I agree that appellant had standing under our holding in United States v. Kelly, 529 F.2d 1365, 1370 (8th Cir. 1976). My disagreement is with the majority holding that “the real search [in Denver] was not made by freight employees but solely by agents of the FBI.”

FBI agents brought a projector to the Emery Air Freight office in Denver after being notified that films had been discovered in a lawful private search by Emery Air Freight employees. The contents of the package had been mislabeled as printed matter and a caller had requested that the package be delivered to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Melvin Corngold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. United States v. Richard Norton Sherwin, Dba Marquis Publishing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. Samuel Gold, Howard Guy Halbett, John Frank Fusco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. Dennis E. PrybaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Thomas Charles KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API