Legal Opinion

Hankins v. Hankins' Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 26, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*476Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Reversing.

Mand Hankins, Eva Hankins Pelts, J. W. Hankins and Oma Hankins were the owners óf five tracts of land. Mand Hankins, Eva Hankins Pelts and her husband, Hr. Logan Pelts, brought suit in the Muhlenberg circuit court against J. W. Hankins and his wife, Eva Hankins, and Oma Hankins, an infant over fourteen years of age, to sell the five tracts of land, on the ground that they could not be divided among the several owners without materially imparing the value of • each interest therein. Judgment was entered on April 21st, 1911,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Hagerstown BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
  2. Wayne v. FoutsTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. McLean v. . LeitchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Jenkins v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  5. Greenough v. SmallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cook v. Estate of ToddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  2. Buschbaum v. Hale, Exr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API