Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Robertson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 9, 2005No. 1050061Published

1ConcurrenceStuart, Justice

I join Chief Justice Nabers’s special concurrence; I agree that when the issue whether a defect in an indictment divests the trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction in a criminal case is properly presented to this Court, we should overrule our precedent that it does. I recognize that I concurred with the majority’s decision to decline the State’s request in Ex parte Lewis, 811 So.2d 485 (Ala.2001), that this Court overrule our precedent holding that the failure of an indictment to allege an essential element of the charge created a jurisdictional defect. I have reviewed Ex parte Lewis and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Ex Parte ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Ex Parte LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Sullens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API