Engle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
The only parties with interest remaining in the outcome of this litigation are plaintiffs, defendant Norman and defendant Fox, administrator. The consent judgments entered in the Norman and Fox cases provide that State Farm would pay its remaining coverage to these claimants. Farm Bureau agreed that if it is ultimately determined in this action that it did provide coverage to Silvers for the accident in question, it would pay its policy limits to both Norman and Fox’s administrator. These claimants agreed to accept either the remainder of State Farm’s coverage or that amount plus…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co. v. BroughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
3Cited by5 opinions
- Murray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Belasco v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- INS. CO. OF N. AMER. v. Aetna Life & Cas.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987