Legal Opinion

Engle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 11, 1978No. 7725SC549PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

The only parties with interest remaining in the outcome of this litigation are plaintiffs, defendant Norman and defendant Fox, administrator. The consent judgments entered in the Norman and Fox cases provide that State Farm would pay its remaining coverage to these claimants. Farm Bureau agreed that if it is ultimately determined in this action that it did provide coverage to Silvers for the accident in question, it would pay its policy limits to both Norman and Fox’s administrator. These claimants agreed to accept either the remainder of State Farm’s coverage or that amount plus…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co. v. BroughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Murray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Belasco v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. INS. CO. OF N. AMER. v. Aetna Life & Cas.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API