Legal Opinion

City of Hurdland v. Morrow

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1993No. WD 46419PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPINDEN, Judge.

Billy Morrow appeals his conviction for maintaining a nuisance in violation of a Hurdland ordinance. He alleges that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the information because of legal deficiencies and that it erroneously transferred venue to Adair County from Knox County. We affirm.

On May 4,1991, Hurdland notified Morrow that the condition of his property was a nuisance in violation of city ordinances. When he did not correct the nuisance to the city’s satisfaction, the city filed an information on June 17, 1991, charging him with maintaining a nuisance.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cottrell v. WoffordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. State v. BaileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  3. City of Green Ridge v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. Louis County v. Avivi HeimanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. City of Bellefontaine Neighbors v. James CarrollMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. City of Skidmore, Missouri v. Rickie L. StantonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API