Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Re on Behalf of Enke

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1955No. 9571Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

■MR. CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR:

(concurring in part and dissenting in part) .

I concur in the' denial of the mother’s motion seeking to quash the writ' of habeas corpus issued herein and seeking to dismiss the proceeding in this court and am in accord with the reasons stated in the majority opinion for such denial.

However, as to those portions of the majority opinion which conclude, determine and adjudge invalid, null and void the 'modification order and judgment of the Superior' Court of Los Angeles County, California, dated November 23, 1954, and entered November 26, 1954, and as to those portions…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Sherrer v. SherrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Coe v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Foster v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API