Freeman v. Badgley
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
Appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
Plaintiff, as assignee of George H. Tay & Co., sues to recover the balance of account for goods sold and delivered.
The court found that the business was conducted by Charles Badgley and Charles F. Schettler under the firm name of Schettler & Co., until November 17, 1888, when Badgley bought out his partner, and conducted the business until December 4, 1888, when he formed a partnership with R. H. Quincey, who is respondent here.
When the firm of Schettler '& Co. was dissolved it was indebted to George H. Tay & Co. in the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Wine Packing Corp. of Cal. v. VossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- In Re Estate of GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Stover v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Wood v. WatermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.