Pyle v. Park

The nature of this case is fully and clearly stated in Park v. Pyle, 157 S. W. 445. Reference is made to such statement, and we will add only such further statement as is necessary to the disposition of this appeal.

After the reversal of the former judgment, it appears that the trial court ordered the parties to replead. In compliance with this order, the plaintiff, Pyle, filed his “third amended original petition,” and the defendants filed their “third amended original answer,” said pleadings styled “third repleader petition” and “third repleader answer,” respectively, in the briefs. The…