Legal Opinion

Richmond's v. Wardlaw & Pogue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1865PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from, Hannibal Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge

The record in this case shows that the judgment was rendered in the Court of Common Pleas on the 9th day of December, 1863, and the motion for a new trial was not filed till the 16th day of the same month. The statute ( R. C. p. 1286, § 6) provides that “ all motions for new trials, and in arrest of judgment, shall be made within four days after the trial, if the term so. long continue; and if not, then before the end of the term.”

In Williams v. Circuit Court (5 Mo. 524), the Supreme Court says: “ The sum of the whole matter under our laws, then, seems to be this; a party sleeps on his rights…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Exchange National Bank v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  2. Mirrielees v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. Lovell v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Nelson v. GhiselinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. State ex rel. Brainerd v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API