Legal Opinion · Dissent

Selective Way Insurance v. Litigation Technology, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 8, 2004No. A04A1172Published

1DissentRuffin, Presiding Judge

The majority has effectively rewritten the insurance policy that Selective Way Insurance Company (“Selective Way”) issued to Litigation Technology, Inc. (“Litigation Technology”). Accordingly, I dissent.

1. The “surface water” exclusion in Litigation Technology’s policy provides that Selective Way

*42will not pay for loss or damage caused directly or indirectly by any of the following. Such loss or damage is excluded regardless of any other cause or event that contributes concurrently or in any sequence to the loss. . . .

g. Water(1) Flood, surface water, waves, tides, tidal waves, overflow of any…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jefferson Insurance Co. of New York v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Prescott's Altama Datsun, Inc. v. Monarch InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Sargent v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Wilkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Aetna Fire Underwriters Insurance v. CrawleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API