Legal Opinion

Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Haines & Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 23, 1989No. 88 C 0026PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Illinois Bell Telephone Co. (“Bell”) brings this action charging defendants Haines & Co., Inc., Haines Criss+Cross Publishers, Inc., William Haines, Jr. and William Haines, Sr. (collectively, “Haines”) with copyright infringement. The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we grant Bell’s motion for summary judgment as to liability and deny Haines’ motion.

Factual Background and Procedural History

Haines markets cross-reference directories which arrange telephone numbers sequentially and by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Interconnect Planning Corporation v. Thomas E. Feil, Robert O. Carpenter, v Band Systems, Inc., and Turret Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Anthony J. Scherer, Jr. v. David J. BalkemaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Miller Brewing Company v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. PPM Finance, Inc. v. Norandal USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
  2. American Permac, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  3. United States v. CollettiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  4. Inland Bank and Trust v. LL Flex, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API