Legal Opinion
Caro v. Marsh USA, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 26, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1069“The supervision of discovery, and the setting of reasonable terms and conditions for disclosure, are within the sound discretion of the Supreme Court” (Ito v Dryvit Sys., 5 AD3d 735, 735 [2004] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Downing v Moskovits, 58 AD3d 671 [2009]). “The Supreme Court’s discretion is broad because it is familiar with the action before it, and its exercise should not be disturbed on appeal unless it was improvidently exercised” (Provident Life & Cas. Ins. Co. v Brittenham, 284 AD2d 518, 518 [2001]; see Wander v St. John's Univ., 67 AD3d 904, 905 [2009]). Contrary to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gordon v. MarroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Frankel v. StavskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Provident Life & Casualty Insurance v. BrittenhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Emigrant Mortgage Co. v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Myers v. MarkeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United Airconditioning Corp. v. Axis Piping, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Yu Hui Chen v. Chen Li ZhiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Yu Hui Chen v. Chen Li ZhiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013