Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lyeth v. Hoey

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 18, 1940No. 142Published

1DissentClark, Circuit Judge

The interesting, if difficult, problem here presented requires us first to interpret and reconcile Supreme Court decisions which *9the Court itself does not regard as conflicting. Lewis v. Reynolds, 284 U.S. 281, 52 S. Ct. 145, 76 L.Ed. 293, and Bull v. United States, 295 U.S. 247, 55 S.Ct. 695, 79 L.Ed. 1421, broadly favored the use, by way of equitable recoupment to either the taxpayer or the United States, of claims for taxes or for refunds, though barred by lapse of time from affirmative enforcement. This same rule was applied in Stone v. White, 301 U. S. 532, 57 S.Ct. 851, 81 L.Ed. 1265,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. United States Ex Rel. Girard Trust Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API