Legal Opinion

Krauss v. Board of Education

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeogh, J.

Motion for leave to serve notices of claim against the board of education of the city tion of the ninety-day period prescribed by section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. The application involves a tort claim *506on behalf of an infant for damages for personal injuries and also a claim by the infant’s mother for loss of services and medical expenses.

The infant, nine years old, was injured on October 10, 1950, in a school yard in Brooklyn when he was hit on the head and face by a ball. A guardian ad litem for said infant was appointed on December 30, 1950. The last day for serving the notices of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russo v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Fullam v. Westchester County Playland CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. MacDowell-Peterman Co. v. Independent Packing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  4. White v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claims of Carr v. Genesee Valley Regional Market AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Torres v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API