Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Wyoming State Board of Equalization

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1991No. 90-97Published

1Concurrence

URBIGKIT, Chief Justice,

specially concurring.

I specially concur. Although well aware of the current national dialogue on the subject of statutory construction, including specifically one approach characterized to be a literalistic implementation, I do not agree with a closed-end and cramped adaptation just like I do not agree that because jurists may differ in the interpretation of a contract, such disagreement necessarily makes the contract ambiguous. We may be the ambiguity.

I have no problem with the application of “legislative intent,” whatever it may be, but the difficulty is introduced…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API