Legal Opinion

Timmons v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1957No. 6350PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

Review by certiorari of an award of the Industrial Commission. The issues presented are the claimed inadequacy of compensation allowed; the matter of attorneys’ fees and procedural questions.

Statement of Facts

Petitioner, Leo M. Timmons, on March 5, 1953, admittedly sustained multiple injuries by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment as a truck driver with Fannin’s Gas & Equipment Company. The Industrial Commission of Arizona, the insurance carrier, promptly assumed jurisdiction by holding the claim to be compensable and it was treated as an “odd…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ison v. Western Vegetable DistributorsArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Davis v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Schnatzmeyer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Kelsey v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Davidson v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Allen v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Stephens v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Shroyer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Magma Copper Company v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Lawler v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API