State v. . Ray
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
We concur with his Honor below, that the defendant is not guilty of forcible trespass. That offense must be charged as being done with a strong hand, "manu forti," which implies greater force than is expressed by the words "vi et armis." There must be a demonstration of force, as with weapons, or a multitude of people, so as to involve a breach of the peace or directly tend to it and be calculated to intimidate or put in fear. S. v. Flowers,5 N.C. 254; S. v. Fisher, 12 N.C. 357; S. v. Mills, 13 N.C. 420. The jury find that the defendant obtained the note from Byrd by stratagem and "fraud."…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. . YoungerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1827
- State v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1830
- State v. . CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- State v. . KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1809
- State v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899