United States v. Shellef
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Dissent
*113POOLER, Circuit Judge:
I respectfully dissent, because I think it error to conclude that Section 3161(e) permits a district court to retroactively grant continuances for re-trial. The text of Section 3161(e) is silent on the issue of when a district court may identify the factors that make trial within 70 days impractical. However, our Court’s speedy trial jurisprudence provides us with a framework that informs the analysis and requires finding Section 3161(e) continuances be granted prospectively.
When a defendant is to be retried following a successful appeal, the Speedy Trial Act (the “Act”)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. James Tunnessen, Douglas Fullerton, and Michael Robert Reape, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Michael KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. ShellefDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011