Legal Opinion
Norstrand v. City of Rochester
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 16, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and petition granted. Memorandum: Petitioner seeks leave to file a late notice of claim against the City of Rochester for damages stemming from the wrongful demolition of three of his buildings. The structures were demolished during a period between October 8 and November 9, 1987. Petitioner asserts that he was not aware of the demolition until late January or early February 1988. This application for leave to serve a late notice of claim was brought on June 23, 1988 and was denied by Supreme Court.
Petitioner was required to serve a notice of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cohen v. Pearl River Union Free School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bay Terrace Cooperative Section IV, Inc. v. New York State Employees' Retirement System Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Passalacqua v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Persi v. Churchville-Chili Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Matter of Persi v. Churchville-Chili Cent. Sch. Dist.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ireland v. HinkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991