Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mears Transportation Group v. Florida

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 11, 1994No. Nos. 93-2080, 93-2191 and 93-2608Published

1DissentRoney, Senior Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the decision of the district court.

The sole issue in this case is whether Session Law 92-29, a Florida law specifying the manner by which owner/operators of for-hire passenger transportation vehicles may prove financial responsibility is preempted by the Federal Liability Risk Retention Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 3901-3906.

*1020All but one of the plaintiffs are individual for-hire passenger transportation companies that are members of Paratransit Risk Retention Group of Maryland, Inc. (“Paratransit”), which is itself a plaintiff. The district court granted partial…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Charter Risk Retention Group Insurance v. RolkaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API