Legal Opinion

Speights v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 1977No. 38627PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Movant appeals the trial court’s denial of his second Rule 27.26 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

*214In his woefully deficient brief,1 mov-ant has raised two alleged points of error, asserting that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in the trial of his first degree robbery conviction, affirmed in State v. Speights, 478 S.W.2d 356 (Mo.1972), and on his initial 27.26 motion.

This is the second Rule 27.26 motion that movant has filed. On November 27, 1972, movant filed a motion alleging, among other things, that he was denied effective assistance of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. State v. ReddMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Harkins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Cruz v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. State v. SpeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. George Frank Lindner v. Donald W. Wyrick, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. Cawthon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Rollins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Lewis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API