Heald v. Michigan Trust Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, C. J.
Plaintiffs in this suit at law seek to recover judgment against the defendant trust company for an alleged unlawful conversion or misappropriation of trust funds under circumstances hereinafter detailed. At the conclusion of all the testimony each party moved for a directed verdict. Thereupon the case was taken from the jury and decision rendered by the court as in a non-jury suit at law. The trial judge held that plaintiffs were not entitled to recover. Judgment was entered accordingly and plaintiffs have appealed.
There is very little, if any, material dispute as to the facts. Henry T.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gibney v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Rothwell v. RothwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Cheney v. RoodhouseIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- City of Detroit v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Fischbeck v. GrossIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Butterfield EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- Gowthorpe v. PageMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- In re Rosati TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989