Legal Opinion · Dissent

Amended August 20, 2014 Christopher J. Godfrey v. State of Iowa Terry Branstad, Governor of the State of Iowa, Individually and in His Official Capacity Kimberly Reynolds, Lieutenant Governor of the State of Iowa, Individually and in Her Official Capacity Jeff Boeyink, Chief of Staff to the Governor of the State of Iowa, Individually and in His Official Capacity Brenna Findley, Legal Counsel to

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 6, 2014No. 12–2120Published

1DissentMansfield, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The majority’s understanding of the Iowa Tort Claims Act is not what the plaintiff argued, is contrary to the language of the statute, and is unworkable as a practical matter. If we consider the argument that Christopher Godfrey actually made, both here and below, I think the district court made the right decision, and I would affirm.

I. The Majority’s Reading of the Iowa Tort Claims Act.

Let me begin with the majority’s reading of the Iowa Tort Claims Act (ITCA). According to the majority, a plaintiff who brings an action against state employees need only add to the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Osborn v. HaleySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Gutierrez De Martinez v. LamagnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Vivian v. MadisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. Casey Mcgill Ginger L. Mcgill Ashlea D. Mcgill And Casey Mcgill, As Parent And Next Best Friend Of Amanda R. Mcgill, Alicia C. Mcgill, And Allison C. Mcgill, Minors Vs. Ben Fish, Thomas Vine, Mark Newton, Robert Selby, And Steven ShafferSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  5. First Newton National Bank v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API