United States v. Apel
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Roberts
*361Federal law makes it a crime to reenter a "military ... installation" after having been ordered not to do so "by any officer or person in command." 18 U.S.C. § 1382. The question presented is whether a portion of an Air Force base that contains a designated protest area and an easement for a public road qualifies as part of a "military installation."
I
A
Vandenberg Air Force Base is located in central California, near the coast, approximately 170 miles northwest of Los Angeles. The Base sits on land owned by the United States and administered by the Department of the Air Force. It is the site of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. GraceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. AlbertiniSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Flower v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Guedes v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Abramski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Verlo v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Aposhian v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Rico WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.