Legal Opinion
Noe v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 16, 1958No. 14064PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from a comparative proceeding before the Federal Communications Commission to determine which of three applicants should be awarded authority to operate a commercial television station on VHF Channel 4 in New Orleans, Louisiana. The hearing examiner recommended a grant to the Times-Picayune Publishing Company, preferring it over appellant James A. Noe & Company and over intervenor Loyola University, a Jesuit educational institution in New Orleans. The Commission, after hearing argument en banc, awarded the license to Loyola University. Each of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Trinity Methodist Church v. Federal Radio CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
- McClatchy Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Sacramento Telecasters, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- WOKO, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Dixie Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Federation of Musicians and Its Local Union No. 174 v. Federal Communications Commission, Loyola University, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Noe v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958