Legal Opinion

Powel v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 14, 1950No. 33883Published

1Opinion of the CourtLuttrell, J.

This action was originally commenced by William B. Powel and Anna M. Powel, his wife, and a number of other plaintiffs, to cancel mineral conveyances made to defendants, B. H. Rogers, W. G. Rogers and Thomas E. Nix, trustees of Pan Mutual Royalties Company, and Pan Mutual Royalties Company, a Trust Estate. The trial court sustained a demurrer for misjoinder of causes of action to the petition of plaintiffs, and required that the various plaintiffs separately docket their separate causes of action against the defendants, but permitted the case to go to trial as to the plaintiffs, William B.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hurst v. ChampionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Oklahoma Fullers Earth Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Myers v. Oklahoma Oil & Gas Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Memorial Park v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API