Legal Opinion

State v. English

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1919No. File No. 4487PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from- 'Circuit Court, 'Mellette 'County. Hof. 'William Williamson, Judge. The defendant, James R. English, was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, and has appealed from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying a new trial. The property alleged to have been stolen is the same which the defendant in State v. Larson, 172 N. W. 114 (decided at this term), was convicted of stealing. ’ It is clear that it was the state’s theory that 'this appellant and Larson joined in the theft. The evidence tended to show that part of the property, claimed to have been stolen, was found in appellant’s possession.- The records in the two cases and the errors assigned, so far as such alleged;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. MurphySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Edward Thompson Co. v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Long v. CollinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Territory of Dakota v. KingSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889
  5. State v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HoltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Saunders v. Farmers' & Merchants' National BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State v. McCoilSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State v. CornerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. TescherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API