Legal Opinion

Neely v. United States

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided April 17, 1973No. Civ. 72-705PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FULTON, Chief Judge.

This is an action for wrongful levy brought pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7426 to recover the sum of $25,000 which was deposited with the Clerk of this Court as an all-cash appearance bond for August Charles Michael Sanzone and which the Clerk subsequently paid to the United States in accordance with a notice of levy as to Sanzone’s outstanding federal tax liability. This Court has jurisdiction of this cause. 26 U.S.C. § 7426 and 28 U.S.C. § 1346(e). The factual question presented for trial was whether the $25,000 constituted the sole property of plaintiff, Ted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bank of Hawaii v. BenchwickDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1966
  2. Heine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. Rudd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  4. Calvin & Co. v. United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Rey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Andrew EschweilerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Brett Allen BurseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Harvey Rubenstein, Bernard C. Sherman, Claimant-Appellant v. City National Bank, Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. United States v. Roy Marion JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API