Legal Opinion

Edgell v. Francis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Eaton. (Hooker, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in the former report of .the case, found in 66 Mioh. 303.

1Opinion of the Court

McGrath, J._

Plaintiff sued defendant, his father-in-law, for enticing away plaintiff’s wife and child, and recovered judgment for $101, and defendant appeals.

Eighteen requests were submitted by counsel for defend.ant to the trial judge, three of which are not relied on, .seven are admitted to have been given, five are alleged to ¡have been improperly given, and three to have been refused. Defendant’s exception is a general one, in the following language:

“And the court thereupon refused.to charge the jury as requested by the defendant, to which refusal defendant -excepted.”

*233The assignment of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edgell v. FrancisMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Tupper v. KilduffMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Danielson v. DyckmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James v. HoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API