Legal Opinion

Antiel v. V.W.E. Investments

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 28, 1984No. C6-84-822PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellants appeal the trial court’s order dismissing the complaint against defendants Richard Vorwerk and Russell Vor-werk individually and as general and limited partners for lack of personal jurisdiction. The order was based upon insufficient service of process. We affirm.

FACTS

Plaintiffs sued defendants on contract and fraud claims in connection with real estate investments. The original defendants were V.W.E. Investments, Vorwerk Investments, Richard Vorwerk, individually and as a general and limited partner, and Russell Vorwerk, individually and as a general…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. SylteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. State v. RitholzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community v. Pan American Management Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
  2. Pago Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Ye Ahn Moolsoan, Ltd.High Court of American Samoa · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API