Legal Opinion

Stearns v. Norton

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1950No. 7642PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

This action was brought by a foreign administrator to recover on a foreign judgment.1 On the first trial at the close of plaintiffs’ case, a judgment of dismissal “without prejudice” was entered. This court held that judgment to be a nullity and remanded the cause “for further appropriate action.” Stearns v. Strom, 68 Idaho 392, 195 P.2d 337. When the case *437again came before the district court, that court granted a motion by the plaintiffs to substitute the administrator appointed by the Probate Court of Boundary County, Idaho, as plaintiff instead of the administrator…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Holmstrom v. WallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People ex rel. Callahan v. DeYoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Myers v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hutchins v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. SlaterIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Sky Canyon Properties, LLC v. Golf Club at Black Rock, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Sky Canyon Properties, LLC v. Golf Club at Black Rock, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API