Stearns v. Norton
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Justice.
This action was brought by a foreign administrator to recover on a foreign judgment.1 On the first trial at the close of plaintiffs’ case, a judgment of dismissal “without prejudice” was entered. This court held that judgment to be a nullity and remanded the cause “for further appropriate action.” Stearns v. Strom, 68 Idaho 392, 195 P.2d 337. When the case *437again came before the district court, that court granted a motion by the plaintiffs to substitute the administrator appointed by the Probate Court of Boundary County, Idaho, as plaintiff instead of the administrator…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Holmstrom v. WallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People ex rel. Callahan v. DeYoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Myers v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hutchins v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. SlaterIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Sky Canyon Properties, LLC v. Golf Club at Black Rock, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- Sky Canyon Properties, LLC v. Golf Club at Black Rock, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2015