Gerald J. Provost, D/B/A Vet's Salvage Diving v. Paul J. Huber
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
VAN SICKLE, District Judge.
The Appellant Provost brings this timely appeal from an order of the district court 1 which dismissed his complaint and first amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The action was brought under the admiralty or maritime jurisdiction of the federal courts, and sought a salvage award. The district court, in ruling upon Appellee Huber’s Rule 12(b)(1) motion, found lacking a nexus with traditional maritime activity and dismissed the action upon that ground. 2
The basic facts of this novel case are undisputed. From the allegations of the complaints…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cope v. Vallette Dry Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Lambros Seaplane Base, Inc. v. The Batory Gdynia-America Shipping Lines, Limited v. Lambros Seaplane Base, IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Broere v. Two Thousand One Hundred Thirty-Three DollarsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1947
- Colby v. Todd Packing Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sullivan v. GENERAL HELICOPTERS, INT'LDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Sunglory Maritime, Ltd. v. PHI, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016