Commonwealth v. McCabe
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
SPAETH, President Judge,
dissenting:
I do not believe that the Commonwealth has carried its burden of establishing the corpus delicti by evidence independent of appellant’s confession or admission. Accordingly, I should reverse the judgment of sentence.
The general rule that governs this case is well settled:. The corpus delicti may not be established by a confession or admission standing alone. It follows that a confession or admission alone cannot support a conviction. Putting it conversely, a confession or admission must be corroborated by independent evidence of the corpus delicti. The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Commonwealth v. ForbesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. WareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. LittleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. TurzaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.