In re a Majority of the Trustees of Schuyler's Steam Tow-Boat Co.
New York Supreme Court
Appeal by Michael Moran, Peter Cahill, Cynthia Cahill and Jarvis Masters from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of Albany county on the 8th day of February, 1892, enjoining the appellants from taking any further proceedings in actions in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, in which they had filed libels against certain steamboats of the Schuyler Steam Tow-Boat Company, and also enjoining them from taking any…
Read the full summary
Appeal by Michael Moran, Peter Cahill, Cynthia Cahill and Jarvis Masters from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of Albany county on the 8th day of February, 1892, enjoining the appellants from taking any further proceedings in actions in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, in which they had filed libels against certain steamboats of the Schuyler Steam Tow-Boat Company, and also enjoining them from taking any proceedings looking to the condemnation or sale of the steamboats. Frank D. Sturges was appointed temporary receiver of…
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was delivered at the Special Term:
Putnam, J.:
It is settled by the Court of Appeals in a similar case (Matter of the Christian Jensen Company, 40 N. Y. St. Rep., 621) that the filing of the original petition, and entry of the order thereon, appointing Frank D. Sturges receiver of the -Schuyler Steam Towing Company, at once vested the title of the property of said corporation in said receiver. He could not act until the giving of his bond, but on filing such bond his title related back to the date of his appointment. The court held in the case cited that after the filing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Wallace v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Walling v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Attorney-General v. Guardian Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Rio Grande Railroad v. GomilaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.